🖧 Technology & Internet

Open-Source Project 'Security Vulnerability' Keyword Density

Tracking the presence of security vulnerability keywords in open-source projects.

Observations
40
Tracking since
Last updated

Security Keyword Density

The percentage of words in a project's documentation that are related to security keywords.

20 observations across 4 series · measured in %

7.7%
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
2.4%
usestrix/strix
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
1.9%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
0.2%
caddyserver/caddy
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
Security Keyword Density (%) — summary, last 30 days.
  • Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking
  • usestrix/strix
  • swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings
  • caddyserver/caddy
0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%19:3219:3819:45Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 7.7% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 7.7% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 7.7% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 7.7% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45usestrix/strix: 2.4% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32usestrix/strix: 2.4% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32usestrix/strix: 2.4% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45usestrix/strix: 2.4% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 1.9% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 1.9% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 1.9% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 1.9% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 1.9% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 1.9% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45caddyserver/caddy: 0.2% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32caddyserver/caddy: 0.2% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32caddyserver/caddy: 0.2% — 29 Oct 2026 19:32caddyserver/caddy: 0.2% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45caddyserver/caddy: 0.2% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45caddyserver/caddy: 0.2% — 29 Oct 2026 19:45
Security Keyword Density (%) — line, last 30 days.
  • Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking7.7%
  • usestrix/strix2.4%
  • swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
  • caddyserver/caddy0.2%
Security Keyword Density (%) — bar, last 30 days.
  • Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking7.7%
  • usestrix/strix2.4%
  • swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
  • caddyserver/caddy0.2%
Security Keyword Density (%) — dot plot, last 30 days.
Security Keyword Density (%) — share, last 30 days.
0.2%–0.8%: 6 observations0.8%–1.4%: 0 observations1.4%–2.0%: 6 observations2.0%–2.7%: 4 observations2.7%–3.3%: 0 observations3.3%–3.9%: 0 observations3.9%–4.6%: 0 observations4.6%–5.2%: 0 observations5.2%–5.8%: 0 observations5.8%–6.4%: 0 observations6.4%–7.1%: 0 observations7.1%–7.7%: 4 observations0.2%7.7%6
Security Keyword Density (%) — distribution, last 30 days.
Security Keyword Density observations
WhenSeriesSecurity Keyword Density
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking7.7%
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking7.7%
usestrix/strix2.4%
usestrix/strix2.4%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
caddyserver/caddy0.2%
caddyserver/caddy0.2%
caddyserver/caddy0.2%
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking7.7%
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking7.7%
usestrix/strix2.4%
usestrix/strix2.4%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings1.9%
caddyserver/caddy0.2%
caddyserver/caddy0.2%
caddyserver/caddy0.2%
Security Keyword Density (%) — table, last 30 days.

Security Mentions Per Project

The total count of security-related keywords found in a project's documentation.

20 observations across 4 series · measured in count

79 count
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
44 count
usestrix/strix
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
4 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
2 count
caddyserver/caddy
▬ 0.0% vs previous
29 Oct 2026 19:45
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — summary, last 30 days.
  • Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking
  • usestrix/strix
  • swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings
  • caddyserver/caddy
02040608019:3219:3819:45Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 79 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 79 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 79 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking: 79 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45usestrix/strix: 44 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32usestrix/strix: 44 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32usestrix/strix: 44 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45usestrix/strix: 44 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 4 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 4 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 4 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 4 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 4 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings: 4 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45caddyserver/caddy: 2 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32caddyserver/caddy: 2 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32caddyserver/caddy: 2 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:32caddyserver/caddy: 2 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45caddyserver/caddy: 2 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45caddyserver/caddy: 2 count — 29 Oct 2026 19:45
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — line, last 30 days.
  • Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking79 count
  • usestrix/strix44 count
  • swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
  • caddyserver/caddy2 count
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — bar, last 30 days.
  • Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking79 count
  • usestrix/strix44 count
  • swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
  • caddyserver/caddy2 count
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — dot plot, last 30 days.
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — share, last 30 days.
2 count–8.417 count: 12 observations8.417 count–14.833 count: 0 observations14.833 count–21.25 count: 0 observations21.25 count–27.667 count: 0 observations27.667 count–34.083 count: 0 observations34.083 count–40.5 count: 0 observations40.5 count–46.917 count: 4 observations46.917 count–53.333 count: 0 observations53.333 count–59.75 count: 0 observations59.75 count–66.167 count: 0 observations66.167 count–72.583 count: 0 observations72.583 count–79 count: 4 observations2 count79 count12
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — distribution, last 30 days.
Security Mentions Per Project observations
WhenSeriesSecurity Mentions Per Project
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking79 count
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking79 count
usestrix/strix44 count
usestrix/strix44 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
caddyserver/caddy2 count
caddyserver/caddy2 count
caddyserver/caddy2 count
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking79 count
Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking79 count
usestrix/strix44 count
usestrix/strix44 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings4 count
caddyserver/caddy2 count
caddyserver/caddy2 count
caddyserver/caddy2 count
Security Mentions Per Project (count) — table, last 30 days.

About this data

This page monitors the density of keywords related to security vulnerabilities within open-source projects. It quantifies how often terms like 'vulnerability', 'exploit', 'patch', and 'CVE' appear in project documentation, discussions, and code. This provides an indicator of how actively security concerns are being addressed and communicated within these communities.

We analyse publicly accessible data from various sources, including project repositories, issue trackers, and community forums. By aggregating and processing this information, we can calculate the average number of security mentions per project. This metric helps to gauge the general awareness and responsiveness to security threats across the open-source landscape. As open-source documentation is constantly evolving, this ongoing measurement offers a unique perspective on a dynamic and critical aspect of software development.

Sources

Every figure on this page was read from these pages.

Why this isn't published anywhere else

While there are resources tracking open-source project security vulnerabilities, none specifically measure and publish 'Security Vulnerability' Keyword Density, making the proposed topic partially covered but not directly tracked.

Uniqueness score 0.90 — assessed against live web search results when this subject was created.